De operationele ad-hac-val

The Highest Logical Level – purpose – explored in detail

By Guus Hustinx

In November 2025, Robert Dilts gave a three-day masterclass for the IEP on the Logical Levels; it was fascinating to immerse myself in that model for three days without getting bored for a moment. It indicates how important that model is in NLP and has since been discovered outside of it as well. It has been one of my favorite NLP models for years. It was developed by Robert based on the research and publications of anthropologist and knowledge scientist Gregory Bateson. I use this model at both the individual level and the team and organizational level. I apply it for myself to maintain my congruence and to continue feeding my passion. 
Time and again, I discover that the source of my energy lies in, and is nourished primarily by, my purpose. I realized that the perhaps most essential level, purpose, is simultaneously the most abstract and vague, something many people struggle to put into words, while they do experience it as a deeply felt source. Over the years, I have guided countless professionals and teams in exploring and experiencing the logical levels. And in all those hesitant words regarding the level of purpose, I gradually began to discover patterns. Reason enough to take a closer look at those patterns.

bron: Robert Dilts 2025

bron: Robert Dilts 2025

Purpose explored in more detail
Robert Dilts (2025) writes about the level of purpose as the awareness, being conscious, that we as individuals are part of a larger whole, a subsystem of a larger system. Feeling part of such a larger whole is—almost always—accompanied by experiencing a (life) mission: ‘I have a contribution to make, a (specific) role to fulfill, an important message to deliver’. The word ‘purpose’, often used in this context, refers to this: an intention, a higher goal.

In the form of the language people use, when articulating their purpose, we can hear that larger whole and/or that felt mission.

A few examples:
– ‘Getting the maximum out of myself; ‘Develop all my talents’.
– ‘Believe in myself; live by my core values’.
– ‘Become who I am; be allowed to be myself’.
The mission is clear here; the greater whole is not explicitly named. These statements seem to be primarily focused on ‘self’. A few other examples:
– ‘Create a safe environment for my children’.
– ‘Helping people
– ‘Make my contribution to our society’.
– ‘Leave behind our world a little better.’
– ‘Take care of a healthy planet’.
– ‘Pass on the spiritual power of the universe’.
Both the mission and the greater whole are articulated in these statements. They are focused on ‘other’ and ‘we’.

We see here that people refer to that greater whole of which they are a part, along the lines of: family, relatives/friends, (religious, ethnic, cultural) community, society, and planet/universe.

It is interesting to see those differences in systemic levels, as people apparently experience them.

I then wondered how those differences arise. We have already seen that the level of purpose is experienced as ‘consciousness’, and this led me to the idea of ​​different stages of consciousness. I decided to explore this further in relation to the level of purpose.

Stages of Consciousness
Frederic Laloux introduced the concept of ‘stages of consciousness’, based on ideas by Ken Wilber, in his book ‘Reinventing Organizations’ (2014). He describes these stages as an evolutionary development process in which humanity reaches an increasingly higher level of consciousness in relation to the greater whole of which it is a part. That level of consciousness determines how it relates to that greater whole. In accordance with the logical levels, he posits that every ‘higher’ level encompasses all ‘lower’ ones. There is, therefore, such a thing as a hierarchy of levels of consciousness. For the description of these stages, Laloux relies heavily on the Graves categories (1970):

Security	Purple	Safety, belonging, tradition, rituals, the group comes first
Power	Red	Fight, strength, honor, impulsive, reputation, loyal to the leader
Order	Blue	Duty and control, hierarchy, belief in authority, procedures
Success	Orange	Competition, winning, distinguishing oneself, results, status
Community	Green	Group feeling and ideals, consensus, sharing, harmony
Synergy	Yellow	Innovation, creativity, learning, personal growth, co-operation
Holism	Turquoise	Ecology, unification, integration, balance, responsibility

Stages of consciousness and purpose
How is ‘purpose’, the relationship to the greater whole, experienced in these diverse stages of consciousness? A brief characterization:

Security (purple)
The desire to be part of the group and surrender to that group and the leader. We see this purpose primarily in religious and idealistic groups. The individual lets go of his own identity and becomes part of a larger group identity.

Power (red)
We see this as the purpose for the MAGA movement in the US. By acquiring the best possible position for oneself and one’s own group through power and strength, if necessary at the expense of others, in a permanent ‘zero-sum’ fight; loyalty to the leader who has absolute power.

Order (blue)
Acceptance of everyone’s place in the hierarchy, because this is how you become a valued part of the group. The willingness to follow direction, rules and procedures established higher up in the hierarchy. Pushing the same doctrine to those lower in the hierarchy.

Success (orange)
Wanting to be the best, distinguishing yourself from others, competing for it, gaining status. Thè purpose of (neo)liberalism. Scarcity as a starting point, you have to fight for it otherwise someone else will take over.

Community (green)
Being an equal part of the group, wanting to share, consensus. Dealing with each other in harmony and solidarity. Being there for each other. Working together for the self and the bigger whole.

Synergy (yellow)
Advancing science and knowledge, learning. Interdisciplinary collaboration. Understanding complexity, innovation, getting the best out of yourself, independence, in order to contribute to the higher goal, for example a ‘better world’.

Holism (turquoise)
The Gaia consciousness, I am part of the entire economic and ecological system of this planet. And I am (jointly) responsible for that, I have a role, an assignment. I see through, feel and experience the coherence of things.

Let us explore that stage of holism a little further.

The drop and the ocean
‘You are not a drop of water in an ocean
You are the entire ocean in a drop
Jalal-Ad-Din Rumi, poet and philosopher

As individuals, we are a subsystem of a larger system, as we saw. The concept of the holon and the holarchy [Albert Koestler (1964) and Robert Dilts (2015)] adds another dimension. A holon consists of sub-parts and is itself part of a larger whole that is in turn part of, and so on: this is how the ‘holarchy’ is created, the layered image that we can also see in the system levels.
The important first principle is that all essential system information is available at all levels of the holarchy. So I am part of a larger whole and at the same time carry – all information of – the larger whole within me. This means that the bigger picture ‘in us’, as soon as we become fully aware of it, has a complete representation in all sensory systems. Such a deeply felt greater whole will therefore color and determine our thinking, feeling, and acting. An important consequence of this is: if I do something to someone else, the group or nature, then I also do it to myself. Taking responsibility for the bigger picture is therefore simultaneously taking responsibility for myself and vice versa.
The second principle of the holon and the holarchy is the idea that we as individuals cannot exist without the greater whole and the greater whole cannot exist, or at least not in its full potential, without the qualities and contributions of the subparts. After all, all sub-parts together create the bigger whole

If we look at the various stages of consciousness through the lens of these two principles, an interesting picture emerges. For the sake of brevity of my argument, I will summarize some stages.

Security: everyone, except perhaps the leader, gives up their identity and, as it were, merges into the group. The effect is that the whole of the group cannot reach its full potential because the ‘sub-part’ of the individual is missing. The group relies heavily on the leader who provides direction and raison d’être. We recognize this pattern in sects.
Power and order: in these stages everyone sees themselves as a drop in the ocean: alone. I can only exist if I submit to the group, the leader and his morals. I can never achieve my full potential as an individual in those circumstances, and therefore the group cannot achieve its full potential either. A suboptimal situation that we can see escalating all too often in practice.
Success: Even at this stage I experience standing alone, I do not experience a bigger picture. However, I now compete with others, I do not submit. I stand against the others, they are my competitors. Again sub-optimal, because the realization that cooperation is necessary for the bigger part to realize its full potential is largely missing.
Community, synergy, and holism: in these stages, we see an increasing awareness of holon and holarchy emerge. On the one hand, I am separate, with my own identity, and at the same time, part of and dependent on the greater whole. In the stages of ‘community’ and ‘synergy,’ we see a search for balance between the ‘I’ and the ‘greater system.’ With ‘holism,’ an increasing integration of both emerges: the ocean in the drop. The NLP concept of ecology acquires its full spiritual meaning in this final stage. There is also a direct connection here with the ‘extended fourth perceptual position,’ see my previous article.

In 2017, the Whanganui River in New Zealand was recognized as a living entity with rights. The Maori had to fight for this for a long time, driven by their feeling that they literally feel one with the river. The law now literally states: ‘I am the river – the river is me.’ (Source: Kanteltijd, Jan Rotmans 2026)

The Confusion
In conversation with colleagues about that highest logical level, we wondered whether your ‘purpose’ is context-dependent? Our first thought was, no. Yet we all know the experience in certain situations of feeling separated, of the connection with the greater whole seeming to be broken. How does that fit into my preceding argument?

The principle of a hierarchy of consciousness levels shows that we have represented all earlier stages within ourselves. Those earlier stages are linked to parts of ourselves, which may in turn be linked to specific—historical—situations or groups. For instance, I notice that with my old mountaineering friends, I unconsciously step back to the stage of consciousness of ‘success’ back then: mutual competition, showing that I am the best. As if an (old) part takes over and obscures my view of what I stand for *now*.

Conversely, there are situations where my holistic awareness is actually stimulated. For example, when I coach a group or a team. I am part of the group, I am in the group, and at the same time I embrace the group; the group is, as it were, inside me (which is a beautiful description of a pure fourth perceptual position).
So yes, situations can arise where parts of us that are still identified in an earlier stage take over the lead, causing us to temporarily lose ‘our current self’ to a certain extent. The degree to which this happens says something about how congruently we live according to our highest purpose. My conclusion is that we must continue to actively nourish our purpose.

And then?
The realization that we are holons within a holarchy gives depth and foundation to our purpose. In this way, we can make a deep connection with our (life) mission—our purpose. Robert Dilts sees this as *the* foundation of ‘conscious leadership’. He places this within the 4th generation of NLP, which focuses on the bigger picture, on ‘the field’, and the skills and beliefs that belong to it or still need to be developed. A little closer to myself, the deepening of my own purpose and the awareness of the effects of my own stages of consciousness have greatly stimulated me to live my own purpose congruently and to ‘be’ within that greater whole that I carry within me. Not always easy, because besides the overwhelming positive feeling of being part of it, I also feel the pain of the greater whole. Especially in these times when so much damage is being done to the totality of humanity and the planet.

I have experienced that supporting people in exploring their purpose, how it can take shape, and what their sphere of influence is within that greater whole, is enormously helpful. You help someone find and live through their (life) mission, the source of their ‘being’. Not just with the head, the words, but also by feeling it deeply. It is fantastic to see what happens to people then.

That is what I wish for you too, dear reader: a beautiful journey to your ‘purpose’.